The relationship between salary satisfaction and job satisfaction
·
Pay
Pay is a quantifiable indicator of
an employee's value since it reflects the degree of financial compensation that
employees expect to get in exchange for their organisational contributions.
Companies must offer competitive
and equal pay in order to compete for the best employees. It has been stated
that while compensation initially motivates many workers, it lacks long-term
potency as a motivator. In today's competitive economic environment, where
strategic compensation planning is required, the importance of pay in luring
and keeping employees at work has long been acknowledged (Jackson &
Schuler, 2006).
·
Salary
and job satisfaction
The relationship between pay
practices and job satisfaction is crucial for boosting employee motivation,
which will raise staff productivity. Wage efficiency theories claim that high
wages occasionally can boost productivity. Because it significantly affects
employee turnover. According to these views, it is difficult for employees who
earn high salaries to leave their positions. In fact, the relationship between
pay practices and job satisfaction according to ideas of efficiency wages is
unclear. Numerous studies, including one by Stearin, look at the general job
satisfaction of Dutch public employees in relation to their salary. The
findings indicate that the presence of HR practices, namely pay practices, has
a favourable impact on work satisfaction.
The effect of salary disparity and
human resource management methods on employees' job satisfaction is also
something that Bradley, Petrescu, and Simmons. However, some other elements of
the workforce, such as gender, marital status, and market elements like labour availability and starting pay scale, can have an impact on professional staff
retention.
Employees making high wages are
more inclined to view incentive compensation as helpful. Maslow's (1943)
hierarchy of wants states that having more money might help with satisfying
esteem needs because a high pay implies superior aptitude and total individual
value. Therefore, even once basic physiological and security demands are met,
some people still view a large pay as a sign of competence and personal worth.
Performance pay is evaluated because it is difficult to quantify, can encourage
people to place too little emphasis on it, can weaken intrinsic interest, only
some people benefit financially from it, is detrimental to teamwork and
cooperation, and can cause general pay costs to increase earlier if not
strongly measured.
Employee intention toward job
safety affects pay satisfaction as well. Those who prioritise safety are
happier at work than those who prioritise income increases. According to Kathawala,
Moore, and Elmuti (1990), increased income satisfaction is preferred over
increased job stability.
People who supported a pay rise
demonstrated a less contented attitude toward their current salaries and
overall job satisfaction. People who support improved safety rated it as a
motivator but not as a satisfied, ranking it higher than income satisfaction.
Those in support of a pay raise viewed remuneration as a motivation and a
source of satisfaction, ranking it higher than job security.
·
Critical
analysis on LOLC employees pay scheme.
Individuals must be motivated to fulfil an organisation's objectives, and a competitive compensation package
must be offered to recognise performance that is in line with LOLC Finance's
business model and strategy in order to maximise organisational effectiveness.
Participating in yearly wage surveys allows LOLC Finance to keep its
compensation structure competitive and in line with industry standards. LOLC pays
its employees at a competitive market rate. So, it is helpful for job retention
of the employees. LOLC Finance has gone through a merger. To be a successful
merger it should engage its employees for the long term. In my opinion the pay
scheme is at a good level. But it is better to adjust the pay considering the situation
of the country. Because some BPOs pay allowances based on inflation and exchange
rates of the country. LOLC as a large conglomerate can make the changes.
References
Kathawala, Y., Moore, K.J. and Elmuti, D. (1990),
"Preference between Salary or Job Security Increase", International Journal of
Manpower, Vol. 11 No. 7, pp. 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729010004174
Jackson,
S.E., Chuang,
C.-H., Harden,
E.E. and Jiang, Y. (2006), "Toward Developing Human Resource
Management Systems for Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork", Martocchio,
J.J. (Ed.) Research in Personnel
and Human Resources Management (Research in Personnel
and Human Resources Management, Vol. 25),
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 27-70.
Writer clearly illustrated the general pay practice and recommended the competitive compensation package to the LOLC. However actual pay practice method in LOLC has not mentioned. Therefore writer will more focus that area.
ReplyDeletedue to some confidentiality issues we can not publicly post the data related pay system. i agree it would be more powerful when we give accurate data. but we cant do it
DeleteI find this article insightful in explaining the relationship between salary satisfaction and job satisfaction. The article highlights that while pay is a crucial factor in attracting and retaining employees, it may not be a long-term motivator. The article also discusses the importance of HR practices, including pay practices, in boosting job satisfaction and employee motivation.
ReplyDeleteThe critical analysis on LOLC's pay scheme is also informative. The article highlights the need for a competitive compensation package to recognise employee performance and maximise organisational effectiveness. It also suggests that LOLC should consider adjusting its pay to reflect the country's situation, which is a prudent approach to ensure employee retention.
Thank you for the interest
Delete